Preview

Philology and Culture

Advanced search

Assessment features for complexity of educational texts for schoolchildren

https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-75-1-17-23

Abstract

It is extremely important to choose an appropriate material for the students learning a foreign language. Hence the issues of studying the complexity of academic texts, their readability and their compliance with the level of language proficiency is of outmost importance. At this point, one can note the inevitable interconnection between linguistics and teaching methods. An educational text is a special type of secondary text that has a number of important functions, among which, first of all, there are informative, cognitive and cultural-logical ones. This type of text both contains new information and has an educational and developmental effect on students.

The difficulty of text as well as its readability and complexity are crucial for text understanding. The evaluation of academic texts difficulty is closely connected with consideration of other characteristics. However, there are no widely accepted definitions of such concepts as “difficulty”, “complexity” and “readability” in contemporary linguistics. They are unreasonably used as synonymic notions. That is why the purpose of this article is to more clearly distinguish between these characteristics of the text. The features of complexity assessment of educational texts are revealed on the basis of their key characteristics.

The study of educational texts’ complexity was conducted by using secondary school textbooks on physics. The text analysis was performed with the help of the automated analyzer Rulingva. This study demonstrates the capabilities of this program and presents the results of the analysis, which suggest that the use of Rulingva analyzer could be beneficial not only for linguists, but also for educators, measurement and control materials developers and those preparing for state exams in various academic disciplines.

About the Author

M. A. Dontsov
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Dontsov - graduate student, Kazan Federal University.

18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008



References

1. Kazachkova, M. B., Solnyshkina M. I., Kalinkina T. E. (2015). Eklektika institutsional'nogo diskursa: norma ili narushenie? [The Eclecticism of Institutional Discourse: Standard or Violation?]. Filologicheskie nauki: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Pp. 164–168. (In Russian)

2. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne R. P., Rogers R. L., Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval technical training command. 40 p. Memphis. TN, Naval Air Station. (In English)

3. Oborneva, I. V. (2006). Avtomatizirovannaya otsenka slozhnosti uchebnykh tekstov na osnove statisticheskikh parametrov: dis. … kand. ped. nauk: 13.00.02 [Automated Assessment of the Complexity of Educational Texts Based on Statistical Parameters: Ph.D. Thesis]. 165 p. Moscow. (In Russian)

4. Rozenberg, N. M. (1978). Ispol'zovanie nauchnoi terminologii v shkol'nykh uchebnikakh [Use of Scientific Terminology in School Textbooks]. Pp. 73–84. Moscow. Problemy shkol'nogo uchebnika: sb. nauch. tr. (In Russian)

5. Sokhor, A. M. (1975). Sravnitel'nyi analiz uchebnykh tekstov (na materiale uchebnikov fiziki) [Comparative Analysis of Educational Texts (based on physics textbooks)]. Pp. 104–117. Moscow. Problemy shkol'nogo uchebnika: sb. nauch. tr. (In Russian)

6. Matskovskii, M. S. (1976). Problemy chitabel'nosti pechatnogo materiala [Problems of Readability of Printed Material]. Pp. 126–142. Moscow. Smyslovoe vospriyatie rechevogo soobshcheniya (v usloviyakh massovoi kommunikatsii). Otv. red. T. M. Dridze, A. A. Leont'ev. (In Russian)

7. Mikk, Ya. A. (1981). Optimizatsiya slozhnosti uchebnogo teksta: v pomoshch' avtoram i redaktoram [Optimization of the Educational Text Complexity: Assisting Authors and Editors]. 119 p. Moscow. Prosveshchenie. (In Russian)

8. Solnyshkina, M. I., Gafiyatova, E. V., Kazachkova, M. B. (2020). Instrumenty otsenki slozhnosti teksta: sovremennaya paradigma [Tools for Assessing Text Complexity: A Modern Paradigm]. Pp. 251–263. Lipetsk. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. (In Russian)

9. Dontsov, M. A. (2023). Instrumenty izmereniia i otsenki slozhnosti uchebnykh tekstov [Tools for Measuring and Evaluating the Complexity of Educational Texts]. Pp. 28–33. Kazan. Izdatel'stvo Kazanskogo universiteta. (In Russian)

10. Purysheva, N. S., Vazheevskaya, N. E. (2013). Fizika. 7 kl.: ucheb, dlya obshcheobrazovat. uchrezhdenii [Physics. Grade 7: A Textbook, for General Educational Institutions]. 222 p. Moscow. Drofa. (In Russian)

11. Lyashevskaya, O. N. Sharov, S. A. (2009). Chastotnyi slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na materyalakh Natsional'nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka) [Frequency Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language (based on the National Corpus of the Russian Language)]. 1087 p. Moscow. Azbukovnik. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Dontsov M.A. Assessment features for complexity of educational texts for schoolchildren. Philology and Culture. 2024;(1):17-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-75-1-17-23

Views: 250


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4756 (Print)