Ways of representing the national world in contemporary Mari and Tatar poetry
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-82-4-174-182
Abstract
The article is written within the framework of contextual poetics – a current trend of modern literary studies. It identifies aesthetically immanent factors of national identity in Mari and Tatar poetry based on the works of the modern Mari and Tatar poetesses S. Esaulova and Sh. Zigangirova, revealing characteristic features of the national mentality and features of the individual authorial worldview. The role of context in national literatures is clearly manifested by the specific socio-cultural space and the unique ethnoworld of a particular nation. This determined our interest in the context of the national world in fiction and the ways of its presentation in modern Mari and Tatar lyrical poetry. The study of contextual poetics, deciphering the national picture of the world, makes it possible to present its general/special features, the specificity of ethnocultures and creative individuals representing them. The concept of “the national image of the world” is especially relevant in the era of globalization in connection with the problems of ethnic and cultural communities’ self-identification. The methods of presenting contextual content are described in the article by such elements of contextual poetics as symbolic images, mythologemes, quotations, elements of the frame text, epigraphs, folklore intertextemes, etc. The main research method is the comparative one; in its implementation, historical-genetic, structural-semantic and contextual analysis of lyrical texts is of great importance. The empirical basis of the study is the poetic works of the Mari poet Svetlana Nikolaevna Esaulova (1958-2011) and the lyrical works of the Tatar poetess Shamsia Gatufovna Zhigangirova (1951). The subject of the study is the ways of representing the national world in modern Mari and Tatar poetry. The lyrical poetry of S. N. Esaulova and Sh. G. Zhigangirova has remained unexplored so far, the existing works are just the attempts to outline some of its features; the problems of contextual poetics, in particular, those of representing the national world based on the poetic works of Svetlana Esaulova and Shamsia Zhigangirova, have been presented in this article for the first time. This explains the relevance of our work.
About the Authors
R. KudryavtsevaRussian Federation
Kudryavtseva Raisiya Alekseevna, Doctor of Philology, Professor
44 Kremlyovskaya Str., Yoshkar-Ola, 424000
N. Yusupova
Russian Federation
Yusupova Nurfiya Marsovna, Doctor of Philology, Professor
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
A. Yusupov
Russian Federation
Yusupov Ayrat Faikovich, Doctor of Philology, Professor
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
References
1. Lotman, Yu. M. (1964). Lektsii po struktural'noi poetike [Lectures on Structural Poetics]. Vyp. 1. Vvedenie, teoriya stikha. 195 p. Tartu. (In Russian)
2. Yusupova, N. M. (2024). Tyurkoyazychnaya poeziya Povolzh'ya rubezha KhKh–KhKhI vekov: obshchee i osobennoe [Turkic Poetry of the Volga Region at the Turn of the 20th–21st Centuries: General and Specific Features]. Natsional'nye literatury Povolzh'ya i Priural'ya: issledovatel'skie paradigmy i praktiki: Materialy Vserossiiskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, pp. 261–270. Kazan'. (In Russian)
3. Gachev, G. D. (1999). Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Evraziya: Kosmos kochevnika, zemledel'tsa i gortsa [National Images of the World. Eurasia: The Cosmos of a Nomad, a Farmer, and a Highlander]. 366 p. Moscow, In-t Di-Dik. (In Russian)
4. Sheshunova, S. V. (2006). Natsional'nyi obraz mira v russkoi literature: P. I. Mel'nikov-Pecherskii, I. S. Shmelev, A. I. Solzhenitsyn: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk [The National Image of the World in Russian Literature: P. I. Melnikov-Pechersky, I. S. Shmelev, A. I. Solzhenitsyn: Doctoral Thesis Abstract]. Dubna, 42 p. (In Russian)
5. Natsional'nye literatury respublik Povolzh'ya (1980–2010 gg.): uchebnoe posobie (2016) [National Literatures of the Volga Republics (1980–2010): A Textbook]. Nauch. red. V. R. Amineva. 368 p. Kazan', Kazan. un-t. (In Russian)
6. Merkulova, N. G. (2015). Genezis, definitsiya i tipologicheskie kharakteristiki ponyatiya “kul'turnyi kod” v gumanitarnom diskurse [Genesis, Definition and Typological Characteristics of the Concept of “Cultural Code” in Humanitarian Discourse]. Observatoriya kul'tury. No. 6, pp. 80–84. (In Russian)
7. Esaulova, S. N. (2014). Shinchashket om oncho sulykanla: pochelamut arshash, sharnymash [I Do Not Look into Your Eyes, It Is Sinful: A Cycle of Poems, Memories]. V. M. Izilyanova yamdylen. 192 p. Ioshkar- Ola, Marii kniga savyktysh. (In Mari)
8. Җiһangirova, Sh. (2001). Җirsү: shigyr'lәr, җyrlar [Homesickness: Poems, Songs]. 191 p. Kazan, Tatar. kit. nәshr. (In Tatar)
9. Җiһangirova, Sh. G. (2011). Ilaһiyat: shigyr'lәr [Divinity: Poems]. 399 p. Kazan, Tatar. kit. nәshr. (In Tatar)
10. Yusupova, N. M. (2018). Obraz-simvol kak sistema nominatsii v tatarskoi poezii pervoi poloviny XX veka: dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk [The Image-Symbol as a System of Nominations in Tatar Poetry of the First Half of the 20th Century: Doctoral Thesis]. Kazan', 399 p. (In Russian)
11. Nigamatov, Anatolii. Mifologicheskie predstavleniya [Mythological Ideas]. URL: https://my.mail.ru/community/mari-vlac/2D717A46B0B97EA9.html (accessed: 10.08.2025). (In Russian)
12. Pirogov, German. Mariiskaya poetessa Svetlana Esaulova: “Slov bukety vo mne – slovno pozdnikh tsvetov...” [The Mari Poetess Svetlana Esaulova: “Bouquets of Words in Me Are Like Late Flowers...”]. URL: https://www.marpravda.ru/news/zhiteyskie-istoriiliteratura/slov-bukety-vo-mne-slovno-pozdnikh-tsvetov (accessed: 11.08.2025). (In Russian)
13. Җiһangirova, Sh. (2011). Acham һaman ber үk fal [I Always See the Same Thing]. Kazan utlary. No. 5, pp. 62–65. (In Tatar)
14. Җiһangirova, Sh. Aһ, gomerem, gomerem [Oh, My Life, My Life]. URL: https://erlar.ru/node/2281 (accessed: 04.09.2025). (In Tatar)
Review
For citations:
Kudryavtseva R., Yusupova N., Yusupov A. Ways of representing the national world in contemporary Mari and Tatar poetry. Philology and Culture. 2025;(4):174-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-82-4-174-182
















