Preview

Philology and Culture

Advanced search

On propositional structures in a multimodal humorous text

https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2026-84-2-70-78

Abstract

The present paper is devoted to the issue of a comic effect implementation in multimodal humorous texts at the proposition and surface levels of its semantics. The representative material of the study includes multimodal texts of two types: static (internet-memes) and dynamic (short comic videos). The article considers distinguishing features of multimodal texts per se, their status in modern Internet communication. The paper provides analytical review of the term “proposition”, the main semantic roles of predicate actants that have been studied in contemporary linguistics (agent, patient, experiencer, temporal and others) and outlines the results of the representative material analysis. These results allowed us to establish the fact that the comic effect is implemented at both semantic levels of multimodal texts: the proposition structure at the deep level contains opposing elements involved in creating a contrast, which, in its turn, becomes the basis for creating a comic effect (oppositions, metaphor, pun). The surface level contains elements of different modes that are used for representing proposition meanings and achieving a comic effect. The paper outlines possible directions of further research: exploration of semantic roles, ways of representing them and other means of creating a comic effect in a multimodal text, as well as the study of cognitive mechanisms that constitute the bedrock for producing and perceiving a multimodal text meanings.

About the Author

T S. Kasharina
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation

Kasharina Taisiya Sergeevna, MSLU Ph.D. student, Assistant Professor

9, Bldg. 2 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Str., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. 212 p. L.; N.Y., Routledge. (In English)

2. Iriskhanova, O. K. (2021) Polimodal'nyi diskurs kak ob"ekt issledovaniya [Polymodal Discourse as an Object of Research]. O. K. Iriskhanova. Polimodal'nye izmereniya diskursa. Pp. 15–32. Moscow, izdatel'stvo “Yazyki slavianskikh kul'tur”. (In Russian)

3. Chumikov, A. N., Bocharov, M. P. (2006). Svyazi s obshchestvennost'iu: teoriya i praktika: Ucheb. Posobie [Public Relations: Theory and Practice: A Textbook]. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. 552 p. (Pp. 388–391). Moscow, Delo. (In Russian)

4. Lobin, H. (2018). Digital und vernetzt. Das neue Bild der Sprache [Digital and Networked: The New Image of Language]. 204 p. Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler Verlag, Springer Verlag. (In German)

5. Kibrik, A. A. (2010). Mul'timodal'naya lingvistika [Multimodal Linguistics]. A. A. Kibrik. Kognitivnye issledovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Tom Vypusk 4, pp. 135–152. Moscow, izdatel'stvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”. (In Russian)

6. Schmitz, U. (2015). Einführung in die Medienlinguistik [Introduction to Media Linguistics]. 160 p. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (In German)

7. Kobozeva, I. M. (2000). Lingvisticheskaya semantika. Ucheb. Posobie [Linguistic Semantics: A Textbook]. I. M. Kobozeva; MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. 350 p. Moscow, Editorial URSS. (In Russian)

8. Paducheva, E. V. (2004). Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s deistvitel'nost'yu (referentsial'nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii) [Statement and Its Correlation with Reality (semantics referential aspects of pronouns)]. 288 p. Moscow, Editorial. (In Russian)

9. Gusarenko, S. V. (2015). Propozitsiya kak komponent aktual'nogo diskursa [Proposition as a Component of Actual Discourse]. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. Pp. 159–163. (In Russian)

10. Van Dyke, T. A., Kinch, V. (1996). Strategii ponimaniya svyaznogo teksta [Strategies for Understanding Connected Text]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 13, pp. 153–211. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)

11. Kukatova, O. A. (2021). Tipologiya semanticheskikh rolei aktantov predikatov v sovremennoi lingvisticheskoi nauke [Typology of Semantic Roles of Actants of Predicates in Modern Linguistic Science]. Vestnik ChelGU. No. 1 (447). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tipologiyasemanticheskih-roley-aktantovpredikatov-vsovremennoy-lingvisticheskoy-nauke (accessed: 16.10.2025). (In Russian)

12. Dzemidok, B. (1974). O komicheskom [About the Comic]. B. Dzemidok; perevod s pol'skogo S. V. Svyatskogo. 223 p. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)

13. Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. 426 p. Berlin, Germany, Mouton de Gruyter. (In English)

14. Borev, Yu. B. (1970). Komicheskoe [The Comical]. Yu. B. Borev. 268 p. MIskusstvo. (In Russian)

15. Karasik, A. V. (2001). Lingvokul'turnye kharakteristiki angliiskogo yumora: dis. ... kand.filol. nauk [Linguistic and Cultural Characteristics of English Humor: Ph.D. Thesis]. Volgogradskii gos. ped. un-t. Volgograd, 193 p. (In Russian)

16. Propp, V. Ya. (1976). Problemy komizma i smekha [Problems of Comedy and Laughter]. V. Ya. Propp. 182 p. Moscow, Iskusstvo. (In Russian)

17. Torosyan, M. S. (2005). Fenomen kontrasta v aspekte kontseptual'noi organizatsii khudozhestvennogo teksta: Na materiale yazyka poslevoennoi prozy: dis. kand. filol. nauk [The Phenomenon of Contrast in Terms of the Conceptual Organization of a Literary Text: Based on the Language of Post-War Prose: Ph.D. Thesis]. Stavropol', 184 p. (In Russian)

18. Martynova, O. P. (2005). Kontrast kak semantiko-funktsional'naya osnova khudozhestvennogo teksta (na primere teksta angloyazychnogo korotkogo rasskaza): avtoreferat dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04 [Contrast as a Semantic and Functional Basis of a Literary Text (Based on an English-language Short Story): Ph.D. Thesis]. O. P. Martynova. Moscow, 175 p. (In Russian)

19. Stepanova, N. Yu. (2009). Kontrast kak sredstvo sozdaniya komicheskogo effekta (lingvostilisticheskii aspekt): dis. ... kand.filol. nauk [Contrast as a Means of Creating a Comic Effect (A Linguostylistic Aspect): Ph.D. Thesis]. Kolomenskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut, Moskovskii pedagogicheskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. Kolomna, 184 p. (In Russian)

20. Attardo, S. (2015). Humorous Metaphors. In G. Brône, K. Feyaerts, & T. Veale (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research (pp. 91–110). De Gruyter Mouton. (In English)

21. Morreall, J. (2024). Philosophy of Humor. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/humor (accessed: 11.10.2025). (In English)

22. Mem “Menya svyazali” [I Was Tied Up]. URL: https://pikabu.ru/story/menya_svyazali_8066740, (accessed: 14.10.2025). (In Russian)

23. Meme ‘’Feel Grate’’. URL: https://cleanmemes.com/2015/04/28/feel-grate/ (accessed: 14.10.2025). (In English)

24. Lakoff, D. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. D. Lakoff, M. Dzhonson; Dzh. Lakoff, M. Dzhonson; perevod s angliiskogo A. N. Baranova i A. V. Morozovoi; pod redaktsiei i s predisloviem A. N. Baranova. 256 p. Moscow, URSS. (In Russian)

25. Video “Me and My Brain”. URL: https://www.tiktok.com/@safedletter/video/7327939475957386538?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc (accessed: 14.10.2025). (In English)

26. Video “Kogda zashel k vrachu bez ocheredi” [Video: “When I Entered the Doctor’s Surgery Jumping the Queue”]. URL: https://www.prikol.ru/2014/02/26/ozhidaniya-i-realnost/ (accessed: 14.10.2025). (In Russian)

27. Mem “Ozhidanie i real'nost'” [Expectation and Reality]. URL: https://www.prikol.ru/2014/02/26/ ozhidaniya-i-realnost/ (accessed: 16.10.2025). (In Russian)

28. Meme “Now & Then Teens’’. URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/tfw18e/now_then_teens/ (accessed: 16.10.2025). (In English)


Review

For citations:


Kasharina T.S. On propositional structures in a multimodal humorous text. Philology and Culture. 2026;(2):70-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2026-84-2-70-78

Views: 42

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4756 (Print)