Expressive means of Ahmadu Kurum’s literary language: the role of metaphors, hyperbole, and comparisons
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2026-84-2-94-102
Abstract
The article deals with discursive expressiveness through literary images, which is a characteristic feature of Ivorian writer Ahmadou Kourouma’s work. The combination of different and often unexpected isotopes creates a peculiar mood when reading his works. The author’s style, which relies heavily on oral language, influences the sharpness and hyperbole of images when characterizing facts, characters, and events. The combination of all these factors ultimately leads to the emergence of an expressive note in literary discourse. Kourоuma’s works can be seen as an invitation to think about the French language in terms of description through a certain expressiveness that convinces the reader of its discursive richness. The study demonstrates that in his literary work, Ahmadou Kourouma actively employs a wide range of linguistic tools that are not characteristic of traditional fiction narrative. Comparison, metaphor, and hyperbole are linguistic techniques that contribute to the enrichment of artistic language in Kourouma’s novels. Each of these rhetorical techniques introduces unique semantic nuances, allowing you to structure a literary work in accordance with a certain communicative intent. The use of these strategies makes it possible to effectively manage the translocative effect, which, in turn, contributes to the achievement of the set communicative goals. Thus, the author constructs a multi-layered language synthesis and modifies the structure of the French language in accordance with the set artistic objectives.
About the Authors
I. V. TomichevaRussian Federation
N. V. Pasenko (Rev. Silouan), Archimandrite)
Russian Federation
Rev. Silouan (Pasenko Nikita), Archimandrite, Ph.D. in Orthodox Theology, Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs
Bld. 11, 3 Drevnyaya Str., Sevastopol, 299045
References
1. Bolotnova, N. S. (2007). Filologicheskii analiz teksta [Philological Analysis of the Text]. 520 p. Moscow, izd. Flinta. (In Russian)
2. Vinogradov, V. V. (1959). O yazyke khudozhestvennoi literatury [On the Language of Fiction]. 633 p. Moscow, Goslitizdat. (In Russian)
3. Fontanier, P. (1968). Les figures du discours [Figures of Speech]. 505 p. Paris, Flammarion. (In French)
4. KerbratOrecchioni, C. (1980). L'énonciation de la subjectivité dans le langage [The Expression of Subjectivity in Language]. 272 p. Paris, Armand Colin. (In French)
5. Kourouma, A. (1970). Les Soleils des Indépendances [The Suns of Independence]. 207 p. Paris, Seuil. (In French)
6. Kourouma, A. (1990). Monnè Outrages et Défis [Monnè Outrages and Challenges]. 292 p. Paris, Seuil. (In French)
7. Kourouma, A. (1998). En attendant le vote des bêtes sauvages [While Awaiting the Vote of the Wild Animals]. 404 p. Paris, Seuil. (In French)
8. Kourouma, A. (2000). Allah n’est pas oblige [Allah Is Not Obliged]. 223 p. Paris, Seuil. (In French)
Review
For citations:
Tomicheva I.V., Pasenko (Rev. Silouan), Archimandrite) N.V. Expressive means of Ahmadu Kurum’s literary language: the role of metaphors, hyperbole, and comparisons. Philology and Culture. 2026;(2):94-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2026-84-2-94-102
JATS XML
















