Myth models of the national being in the novel “Do Not Interrupt the Dead” by Salavat Yuzeev
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-74-4-111-119
Abstract
The article investigates the controversial problems of cultural identification of the novel “Don’t Interrupt the Dead” by Salavat Yuzeev in terms of the modern transculturation theory of literature, written in Russian by non-Russian (national) writers. We avoid the term “a Russian-language writer,” which does not seem to be appropriate as it does not reflect mental and aesthetic realities. In the course of the analytical study of the world artistic model in the novel “Don’t Interrupt the Dead”, our main goal is to present the validity and pattern of identifying the writer as a transcultural author who creates a national Tatar model of the world using the means of Russian linguistic culture, but on the basis of mental national and general “Soviet” historiosophical myths.
Mythopoetic analysis seems conceptual for the study of transcultural texts, since it allows us to identify generic mythological correlates of the maternal model of the world interrelated with foreign ethnocultural reality. The analytics, emphasized in the article within the framework of apophatic poetics, makes it possible to consider not only the inconsistent multinational constants of the artistic transcultural model (the borderland of the Russian and Tatar ethnicity and ethos), but also multinational ones in a special format of unity - concordia discors. The article underlines that in the case of transcultural literature, not elimination, but expansion of genetic memory takes place due to the acquisition of another culture as one’s own.
About the Authors
G. Т. Garipova
Moscow City University; A. Kosygin Russian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Garipova Gulchira Talgatovna, Doctor of Philology, Professor
4 Vtoroi Sel'skokhozyaystvennyi Proyezd, Moscow, 121069
Е. F. Shafranskaya
Moscow City University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shafranskaya Eleonora Fedorovna, Doctor of Philology, Professor
4 Vtoroi Sel'skokhozyaystvennyi Proyezd, Moscow, 121069
References
1. Zhenis, N., Kiynova, Zh. (2018). Transkul'turnyi podkhod v ramkakh izucheniya nacional'noj literatury [Transcultural Approach in the Study of National Literature]. Vestnik KazNU. Seriya filologicheskaya. No. 2 (170), pр. 47–51. (In Russian)
2. Shafranskaya, Ye., F., Garipova, G. T. (2023). Tuvinskii tekst v aspekte transkul'turatsii [The Tuvan Text in the aspect of Transculturation]. Polilingvial'nost' i transkul'turnye praktiki. T. 20. No. 3, pp. 497–514. (In Russian)
3. Kabakchi, V. V. (2016). Literator mezhdu dvukh yazykov i dvukh kul'tur [A Writer between Two Languages and Two Cultures]. Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke. No. 2 (50), pp. 70–75. (In Russian)
4. Monisova, I. V., Syryseva, D. Yu. (2018). Roman Salavata Yuzeeva “Ne perebivai mertvykh” kak proza kinematografista [Salavat Yuzeev’s Novel “Don’t Interrupt the Dead” as a Cinematographer's Prose]. Mirovaya literatura na perekrest'e kul'tur i tsivilizatsii. No. 3 (23), pp. 37–43. (In Russian)
5. Tlostanova, M. V. (2000). Problema mul'tikul'turalizma i literatury i literatury SShA kontsa ХХ veka [The Problem of Multiculturalism and Literature in the USA of the Late Twentieth Century]. 400 p. Moscow, IMLI RAN, Nasledie. (In Russian)
6. Dudareva, M. A. (2021). Apofaticheskoe literaturovedenie. Zametki nefilologa [Apophatic Literary Criticism. Notes of a Non-Philologist]. 120 p. Moscow, Merinos. (In Russian)
7. Yuzeev, S. (2015). Ne perebivai mertvkh: Sbornik. [Do Not Interrupt the Dead: A Collection of Works]. 226 p. Kazan', Tatarskoe knizhnoe izd-vo. (In Russian)
8. Dudareva, M. A. (2021). Tanatologicheskii diskurs russkoi slovesnosti kontsa Novogo vremeni. Vvedenie v apofatiku kul'tury [The Thanatological Discourse of Russian Literature of the End of Modern Times. Introduction to the Apophatics of Culture]. 354 p. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Centr gumanitarnyh initsiativ. (In Russian)
9. Garipova, G. T. (2019). Fenomen integral'nogo myshleniya i postroenie novtscionnykh metodik literaturovedcheskogo issledovaniya v sovremennoi nauchnoi paradigme [The Phenomenon of Integral Thinking and the Construction of Innovative Methods of Literary Research in the Modern Scientific Paradigm]. Bulleten' nauki i praktiki. T. 5. No. 5, pp. 467–474. (In Russian)
10. Proletarskaya Luna [Proletarian Moon]. Rodnaya Vyatka. Kraevedcheskij sajt. URL: https://rodnaya-vyatka.ru/places/119496 (accessed: 15.06.2023). (In Russian)
11. Gurevich, P., Spirova, Ye. (2019). Nauka v gorizonte apofatiki [Science in the Horizon of Apophatics]. Filosofskaya antropologiya. T. 5. No. 1, pp. 6–25. (In Russian)
12. Shafranskaya, Ye. F. (2015). Sovremennaya russkaya proza: Mifopoeticheskii rakurs [Modern Russian Prose: Mythopoetic Perspective]. 216 p. Moscow, Lenand. (In Russian)
13. Yampol'skii, M. (1998). Bespamyatstvo kak istok (Chitaya Harmsa) [Unconsciousness as a Source (Reading Harms)]. 379 p. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian)
14. Shafranskaya, Ye. F., Garipova, G. T., Smirnova, A. I. (2022). Metafory ostanovivshegosya vremeni v sovremennoi literature [Metaphors of Stopping Time in Modern Literature]. Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. No. 4, pp. 132–142. (In Russian)
15. Il'in, V. N. (2011). Vavilon i Ierusalim. Demonicheskoe i svyatoe v literature. [Babylon and Jerusalem. Demonic and Sacred in Literature]. 720 p. St. Petersburg, Russkii mir. (In Russian)
16. Satprem. (1993). Shri Aurobindo, ili puteshestvie soznaniya [Sri Aurobindo, or the Journey of Consciousness]. 346 p. St. Petersburg, Savitri. (In Russian)
17. Mikhailova, M. V. (2012). Estetika klassicheskogo teksta [Aesthetics of Classical Text]. 345 p. St. Petersburg, Aleteya. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Garipova G.Т., Shafranskaya Е.F. Myth models of the national being in the novel “Do Not Interrupt the Dead” by Salavat Yuzeev. Philology and Culture. 2023;(4):111-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-74-4-111-119
Views:
163
Email this article 