On the subject of the subjunctive infinitive in Middle Russian and Modern Russian
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-14-19
Abstract
The article explores the subject valency filling of the subjunctive infinitive in Middle Russian and Modern Russian. Our research is based on the handwritten collections of zagоvory dated the 17th and 18th centuries and the materials from the National Corpus of the Russian Language. Usually, both in the modern Russian language and in the Middle Russian period, the subjunctive infinitive was used with agent subjects, referring to creatures with will and consciences. This kind of restriction can be overcome only through personification, as a result of which the non-agent subject is reinterpreted as an agentive one. The restriction on the compatibility of the subjunctive infinitive with non-agent subjects follows from its grammatical semantics: in the Middle Russian language, this verb form expressed an imperative meaning that could be realized if the subject of the action had will and consciousness and was able to control the situation. Over time, the subjunctive infinitive has lost its imperative semantics and in Modern Russian is used in contexts with evaluative meanings. Its usage only with agentive subjects has been preserved as a result of the lost imperative semantics.
About the Author
N. IordaniRussian Federation
Natalia Pavlovna Iordani, graduate student, Junior Researcher
119991
1 Leninskie Gory
119019
18/2 Volhonka Str.
Moscow
References
1. Paducheva, E. V. (2017). Konstruktsiya s nezavisimym infinitivom. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki. Na pravakh rukopisi [A Construction with an Independent Infinitive. Materials for the Project of of the Russian Grammar Corpus Description]. Moscow, 17 p. URL: http://rusgram.ru (accessed: 20. 12. 2022). (In Russian)
2. Dobrushina, N. R. (2016). Semantika kosvennogo nakloneniya: korpusnoe issledovanie grammaticheskoj polisemii : dis. … d-ra. filol. nauk [The Semantics of the Indirect Mood: A Corpus Study of Grammatical Polysemy: Doctoral Thesis]. Moscow, 425 p. (In Russian)
3. The Russian National Corpus. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru/new/index.html (accessed: 20. 12. 2022). (In Russian)
4. Knyazev, M. Yu. (2014). O vzaimodeistvii poryadka slov i semantiki v infinitivnoi konstruktsii s chastitsei by [On the Interaction of Word Order and Semantics in an Infinitive Construction with the Particle By]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskih issledovanii RAN. Russkii yazyk: grammatika konstruktsii i leksiko-semanticheskie podkhody. Vol. X, part 2, pp. 140–154. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)
5. Shuan, A. Rastsvela by skorei listva zolotaya [If Only Golden Foliage Bloomed Soon]. URL: https://stihi.ru/2015/04/07/2429 (accessed: 20. 12. 2022). (In Russian)
6. Pichkhadze, A. A. (2010). Sredstva vyrazheniya imperativnoi i optativnoi semantiki v drevnerusskih i starorusskih preskriptivnyh pamyatnikah [Means of Expressing Imperative and Optative Semantics in Ancient Russian and Old Russian Prescriptive Texts]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya.. No 5. pp. 14–24, Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
7. Bulahovskii, L. A. (1958). Istoricheskii kommentarii k russkomu literaturnomu yazyku [Historical Commentary on the Russian Literary Language]. 488 p. Kiev, Ryadyans'ka shkola. (In Russian)
8. Gusev, V. Yu. (2005). Tipologiya spetsializirovannyh glagol'nyh form imperativa : dis. na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kand. filol. nauk [Typology of Specialized Verbal Imperative Forms: Ph.D. Thesis]. Moscow, 297 p. (In Russian)
9. Bergel'son, M. B. (1990). Problema kontrolya v pobuditel'nyh vyskazyvaniyah [The Problem of Control in Imperative Statements]. L. A. Biryulin, V. S. Khrakovskii (red.). Funktsional'no-tipologicheskie aspekty analiza imperativa. T. II, pp. 13—18. Leningrad, Leningr. otd-nie in-ta yazykoznaniya. (In Russian)
10. Plungyan, V. A. (2011). Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znachenie i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introduction to Grammatical Semantics: Grammatical Meanings and Grammatical Systems of the Languages of the World]. 672 p. Moscow, Rossiyskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. (In Russian)
11. Knyazev, Yu. P. (2016). Agentivnost' kak shkala gradatsii [Agentivity as a Scale of Gradations]. Psiholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoi deyatel'nosti. No 14, pp. 146–156. Ekaterinburg, Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet. (In Russian)
12. Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. A. (2003). Konstruktsii s dativnym sub’ektom v russkom yazyke: opyt korpusnogo issledovaniya. Rukopis' dissertatsii [Constructions with a Dative Subject in Russian: Corpora-Based Research: Ph.D. Thesis, a Manuscript]. Moscow, 324 p. (In Russian)
13. Zagovory dlya idushchih v boi [Zagovory for Those Going to Battle]. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya biblioteka. Fond 299, No 70, XVIII vek. 66 p. (In Russian)
14. Sbornik zagovorov [A Collection of Zagovory]. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya biblioteka. Fond 122, No 70, XVII vek. 149 p. (In Russian)
15. Sbornik zagovorov i molitv [A Collection of Zagovory and Prayers]. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya biblioteka. Fond 199, No 358.1, ХVIII vek. 11 p. (In Russian)
16. Toporkov, A. L. (2010). Russkie zagovory iz rukopisnyh istochnikov XVII–pervoi poloviny XIX vv. [Russian Zagovory from Handwritten Sources of the 17<sup>th</sup> – Early 19<sup>th</sup> Centuries]. 832 p. Moscow, Indrik. (In Russian)
17. Sbornik travnikov i zagovorov [A Collection of Travniki and Zagovory]. Gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii muzei. Sobraniye rukopisei Ye. V. Barsova. No 2257, XVIII vek. 40 p. (In Russian)
18. Voronets, Ya. Polevye tsvety. Stikhi. [Wildflowers. Poems]. URL: https://proza.ru/2016/08/30/17 (accessed: 20. 12. 2022). (In Russian)
19. Apsolon, A. Leisya, pesnya, na prostore. [Flow, Song, in the Open]. URL: https://clck.ru/334mq7 (accessed: 20. 12. 2022). (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Iordani N. On the subject of the subjunctive infinitive in Middle Russian and Modern Russian. Philology and Culture. 2023;(1):14-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-14-19