Documentary principles in fiction in the light of the value-ontological approach
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-127-137
Abstract
The purpose of the publication is to establish the reasons for the growth of the documentary principle in fiction for over the last one and a half centuries in connection with the transformation of the semantic and value powers that the author of the work possesses.
The value aspect of the documentary principle in literature is about the role the fact plays as a link with being, when the writer’s ability and his right to authoritatively act as a subject coming into contact with the cumulative experience of mankind is called into question. In the presence of the documentary principle, the result of a creative act is not a narrowly understood aesthetic product, a phenomenon of an exclusively fictitious nature realized in “autonomous being”, taken outside the “reality of births and deaths” of the author and the reader. Reliance on the fact opens up the possibility for a creative act to be realized as an event, rooted in the space of its responsibility to true being. However, the creative activity of the artist as the founder and organizer of a meaning-generating event still remains an indispensable condition for a work of art. The dialectical unity of the truth of a fact (document) and the individual creative initiative of the author is preserved in literature of a predominantly documentary nature. The author confirms the authenticity of all stamps on the document, personally and artistically ratifying it and overcoming its subjective ontological fluctuation. The formative initiative of the author also remains of paramount importance due to the fact that a direct transfer of life to paper is impossible (either because of its inexpressiveness, or, more often, due to the intolerable traumatic experience that is ousted from the bright field of the individual’s consciousness). The author provides an opportunity for the other (the reader) to have access to the “bare life”, of which he was a witness and a participant, creatively building a subject-shaped structure that ensures this accessibility. The work of V. T. Shalamov serves as a support for the ideas presented in the article.
About the Author
O. MinnullinRussian Federation
Oleg Ramilevich Minnullin, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor
420008
93 Universitetsky Ave.
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Mestergazi, E. G. (2008). Khudozhestvennaya slovesnost' i real'nost' (dokumental'noe nachalo v otechestvennoi literature XX veka) [Fiction and Reality (documentary principles in Russian literature of the 20<sup>th</sup> century)]. 50 p. Moscow. (In Russian)
2. Yakovleva, N. (2012). “Chelovecheskii document”: istoriya odnogo ponyatiya [“Human Document”: The History of One Concept]. 213 p. Helsinki, Helsinki University Print. (In Russian)
3. Literatura i dokument: teoreticheskoe osmyslenie temy (2008) [Literature and Document: Theoretical Understanding of the Topic]. Materialy “kruglogo stola”. IMLI RAN, Moscow. URL: https://imli.ru/seminary-i-konferentsii-2008/1827-kruglyj-stol-literatura-i-dokument-teoreticheskoe-osmyslenie-temy (accessed: 16. 02. 2023). (In Russian)
4. Chukueva, Z. N. (2015). Grani dokumental'nosti i ee variatsii v proze [Facets of the Documentary and Its Variations in Prose]. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki, No. 3, pp. 81–84. (In Russian)
5. Palievskii, P. V. (1979). Dokument v sovremennoi literature [Document in Modern Literature]. Literatura i teoriya, pp. 128–173. Moscow, Sovetskaya Rossiya. (In Russian)
6. Gallai, M., Luzhanin, M., Meras, M. (1966). Zhiznennyi material i khudozhestvennoe obobshchenie [Life Material and Artistic Generalization]. Voprosy literatury, No 9, pp. 3–62. (In Russian)
7. Shalamov, V. T. (2013). Sobranie sochinenii : v 6 t. [Collected Works: In 6 Vols]. Vol. 5.: Esse i zametki. Zapisnye knizhki 1954–1979. 384 p. Moscow, Knizhnyi klub Knigovek. (In Russian)
8. Dostoevskii, F. M. (1994). Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 t. [Collected Works : In 15 Vols]. Vol. 13: “Dnevnik pisatelia” za 1876 god. 541 p. St. Petersburg, Nauka. (In Russian)
9. Galushkin, A. (1982). Predely dokumentalistiki [Limits of the Documentary]. Voprosy literatury, No. 7, pp. 218–222. (In Russian)
10. Gérard, G. (1998). Vvedenie v arkhitekst [Introduction to the Architext]. Figury: raboty po poetike : v 2 t. Vol. 2. Per. s frants. E. Vasil'eva. Pp. 282–340. Moscow, izdatel'stvo im. Sabashnikovykh. (In Russian)
11. Rozanov, V. V. (2015). Opavshie list'ya [Fallen Leaves]. 400 p. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika. (In Russian)
12. Heidegger, M. (2008). Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. Izbrannye raboty raznykh let [The Origin of Artistic Creation. Selected Works of Different Years]. Per. s nem. A. V. Mikhailova. 528 p. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt. (In German)
13. Agamben, G. (2011). Homo saker. Suverennaya vlast' i golaya zhizn' [Homo Saker. Sovereign Power and Bare Life]. Per. s ital. I. Levina. 256 p. Moscow, Evropa. (In Russian)
14. Karpeeva, T. A. (2013). Khudozhestvenno-dokumental'nye zhanry russkoi literatury XI–XX vv. (genezis, zhanry, poetika) [Fiction and Documentary Genres of Russian Literature of the 11<sup>th</sup>–20<sup>th</sup> Centuries (Genesis, Genres, Poetics)]. 99 p. Kazan', Kazanskii federal'nyi universitet. (In Russian)
15. Böger, A. (2001). People’s Lives, Public Images. The New Deal Documentary Aesthetic. 288 p. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag. (In English)
16. Berutti, M. (2007). Varlam Shalamov: literatura kak dokument [Varlam Shalamov: Literature as a Document]. K stoletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Varlama Shalamova. Materialy konferentsii, pp. 199–208. Moscow [no publisher]. (In Russian)
17. Chukueva, Z. N. (2014). Dokument kak sushchestvennyi element sovremennoi literatury [Document as an Essential Element of Modern Literature]. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki, No 1, pp. 100–104. (In Russian)
18. Il'in, I. A. (1996). Osnovy khudozhestva. O sovershennom v iskusstve [Fundamentals of Art. On Perfection in Art]. Il'in, I. A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. Vol. 6, Book 1, pp. 51–182. Moscow, Russkaia kniga. (In Russian)
19. Mikhailik, E. (2019). Spaseniya net : Beseda s filologom Elenoi Mikhailik o proze Varlama Shalamova [There Is No Salvation: A Conversation with Philologist Elena Mikhailik about the Prose of Varlam Shalamov, January 17, 2019]. Besedovala E. Lukoyanova. URL: https://gorky.media/intervyu/spaseniya-net (accessed: 16. 02. 2023). (In Russian)
20. Levi, P. (2010). Kanuvshie i spasennye [Sunken and Saved]. Per. s ital. E. B. Dmitrievoi. 196 p. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo. (In Russian)
21. Jurgenson, L. (2007). Sled. Dokument. Protez. “Kolymskie rasskazy” Varlama Shalamova [Trace. Document. Prosthesis. “Kolyma stories” by Varlam Shalamov]. Per. s nem. Ya. Zavatskaia. Osteuropa, No 6, pp. 169–182. (In Russian)
22. Levinas, E. (2000). Izbrannoe: Total'nost' i beskonechnoe [Selected Works: Totality and Infinity]. Per. s frants. I. S. Vdovina, B. V. Dubin. 416 p. St, Petersburg, Kul'turnaya initsiativa. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Minnullin O. Documentary principles in fiction in the light of the value-ontological approach. Philology and Culture. 2023;(1):127-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-127-137