Linguo-cognitive model analysis of low-format texts in educational discourse (in the course book “English Unlimited” Elementary)
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-173-178
Abstract
The article deals with cognitive modeling of low-format texts from the course book “English Unlimited. Elementary”.
The aim of the article is to reveal the dominant constituents of the linguo-cognitive model and to highlight their relevance to this very level of language learning (Elementary).
The study shows that Participants, Setting and Scene and Act Sequence are the dominant components of the linguo-cognitive model in the texts. The constituent Participants is expressed by personal pronouns and proper nouns. The component Setting and Scene is represented by toponyms and nouns with locative semantics. Action verbs and stative verbs in present tenses are used to express the constituent Act Sequence. The importance of these constituents can be explained by the anthropocentric approach to educational material selection and to the learning process where the main purpose is to develop communicative competence of a student. These components of the linguo-cognitive model and their language representations show that the authors of the course book consider them the leading ones for developing language competence acquired at A2 level of language learning. It has been also found that linguistic representations of the objective-referential situations refer to the concept of National Identity in the educational discourse under analysis.
About the Author
E. YakovlevaRussian Federation
Ekaterina Vasilievna Yakovleva, graduate student
443100
244 Molodogvardeyskaya Str.
Samara
References
1. Karasik, V. I. (2000). O tipah diskursa [On Discourse Types]. Yazykovaya lichnost': institutsional'nyi i personal'nyi diskurs. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Pp. 5–20. Volgograd, izdatel'stvo VGPU “Peremena”. (In Russian)
2. Tilbury, Al., Clementson, Th., Hendra, L. A., Rea, D. (2010). English Unlimited. Elementary Coursebook. 160 p. Cambridge University Press. (In English)
3. Dobrova, V. V. (2015). Modelirovanie kak metod poznaniya nenablyudaemyh ob"ektov. [Meaning Mоdelling оf Nоnоbservable Objects]. Vestnik VyatGU. No 1, pp. 146–152. Vyatka. (In Russian)
4. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. 260 p. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. (In English)
5. Shevchenko, V. D. (2015). Prostranstvennaya i hronologicheskaya dominanty v diskurse [The Spatial and Chronological Dominants in the Discourse]. Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. No. 3 (19), pp. 44–53. (In Russian)
6. Dimitrenko, L. Y. (2005). Makrokontsept “Mouvement” vo frantsuzskoi yazykovoi kartine mira: struktura i leksicheskaya ob"ektivatsiya : avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Makrokoncept “Mouvement” in the French Language Picture of the World: Its Structure and Lexical Expression : Ph.D. Thesis Abstract]. Voronezh, 24 p. (In Russian)
7. Saraikina, Y. S. (2017). Sovremennye tendentsii v angloyazychnom obrazovatel'nom diskurse (na materiale serii uchebnyh posobii “OUTCOMES”): dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Modern Tendencies of English Educational Discourse (based on the “Outcomes” Textbook Series) : Ph.D. Thesis]. Samara, 194 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Yakovleva E. Linguo-cognitive model analysis of low-format texts in educational discourse (in the course book “English Unlimited” Elementary). Philology and Culture. 2023;(1):173-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-173-178