Preview

Philology and Culture

Advanced search

Method of “detachment” in Leo Tolstoy’s trilogy “Detstvo”, “Otrochestvo”, “Yunost”

https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-78-4-317-322

Abstract

The article examines the method of “detachment” in Leo Tolstoy’s trilogy “Childhood”, “Boyhood” and “Youth” (“Detstvo”, “Otrochestvo” and “Yunost’”) as one of the theoretical concepts characteristic of Tolstoy’s entire creative work. This method first appeared in the works of Russian formalists R. Yakobson and V. Shklovsky who made their contributions to the literary theory. Their imagery system perception of a literary work is based on the conviction that in fiction language is removed from the ordinary automatic perception. As the formalists believe, the goal of art is to give a sense of a thing as vision, not as recognition. The creation of art should bring forth the truth about existence. This “emergence of truth” (a term coined by M. Heidegger) is conceivable only on the basis of creation, i.e., on the basis of the “making” of a literary work. Tolstoy’s “strange” perception of the material world and ordinary phenomena speaks not of recognition, but of sensitivity, when one sees a particular object or a phenomenon for the first time. The method of “detachment”, to which Tolstoy came through his own artistic sense, allows one to grasp the actual deep essence of ordinary objects and phenomena within the author’s conception of his work. Thus, an ordinary object (a flapper), seen by the author with a “strange” perception of things, provides the impetus for the formation of an artistic creation about the world of childhood, boy-hood and youth.

About the Author

A. M. Sayapova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Albina M. Sayapova - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Chief Scientific Officer in Leo Tolstoy’s Heritage Studies Center, Kazan Federal University.

18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008



References

1. Khovanskaya, Z. I. (1980). Analiz literaturnogo proizvedeiyniya v sovremennoi frantsuskoi filologii [Analysis of a Literary Work in Modern French Philology]. 393 p. Moscow, “Vysh. Shkola”. (In Russian)

2. Shklovskii, V. (1929). O teorii prozy [About the Theory of Prose]. 267 p. Moscow, “Federatziya”. (In Russian)

3. Livanova, R. Yu. (2017). Formirovanie soznaniya geroya v povesti L. N. Tolstogo “Detstvo” [Formation of the Protagonist’s Consciousness in Leo Tolstoy's Story “Childhood”]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. No. 7. Ch. 1, pp. 44–48. (In Russian)

4. Smirnova, N. N. (2024). Fragmentatsiya i ostranenie kakprotsess: V. B. Shklovskii perechityvaet L. N. Tolstogo [Fragmentation and Estrangement as a Process. V. B. Shklovsky Rereads Leo Tolstoy]. Dva veka russkoi klassiki. Tom 6. No. 2, pp. 66–79. (In Russian)

5. Heidegger, M. (1993). Fenomenoloya. Germenevtika. Filosofiayazyka [Phenomenology. Hermeneutics. Philosophy of Language]. 336 p. Moscow, “Gnozis”. (In Russian)

6. Husserl, E. (1994). Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. Tom 1. Fenomenologya vnutrennego soznaniia vremeni. 192 p. Moscow, “Gnozis”. (In Russian)

7. Tolstoi, L. N. (1935). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 90 tomakh [Complete Works: In 90 Volumes]. Tom 1. Detstvo. Yunosheskie opyty. 378 p. Moscow, Khudogestvennaya literatura. (In Russian)

8. Tolstoi, L. N. (1935). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 90 tomakh [Complete Works: In 90 Volumes]. Tom 2. Otrochestvo. Yunost. 426 p. Moscow, Khudogestvennaya literatura. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Sayapova A.M. Method of “detachment” in Leo Tolstoy’s trilogy “Detstvo”, “Otrochestvo”, “Yunost”. Philology and Culture. 2024;(4):317-322. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-78-4-317-322

Views: 128


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4756 (Print)