Addressee nomination in the presence of a third party in Russian and Arabic linguistic cultures
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-81-3-7-14
Abstract
The article focuses on the linguistic analysis of addressee nomination in the presence of a third party as an element of speech etiquette in Russian and Arabic. The study aims to identify the mechanisms by which forms of address shift depending on the configuration of participants in a communicative act, as well as the pragmatic, sociocultural, and etiquette functions of this phenomenon. In Russian, addressee nomination is predominantly observed in family discourse through the situational use of kinship terms (e.g., “dad,” “grandpa”) directed toward a third party. In the Arabic linguistic culture, an analogous function is fulfilled by the kunya – a nominative structure of the type “Abu/Umm + child’s name” – which exhibits high sociolinguistic markedness used both as identificational and status-related functions. A comparative analysis reveals the structural, pragmalinguistic, and functional characteristics of addressee nomination in both languages, highlighting universal and culture-specific features. The research material comprises authentic fragments of oral communication in everyday, family, and religious contexts, as well as data from lexicographic and linguocultural sources. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the pragmatic strategies of speech etiquette that reflect the sociocultural norms of interaction in Russian and Arabic linguistic cultures. They may also prove valuable for further research in contrastive pragmatics and intercultural communication, as well as for the development of language teaching methodologies that take into account culture-specific features of verbal behavior.
About the Authors
Ghriekanah Alia Saleem Eslaeem AbuRussian Federation
Abu Ghriekanah Alia Saleem Eslaeem, Ph.D. student,
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
N. V. Gabdreeva
Russian Federation
Gabdreeva Nataliya Viktorovna, Doctor of Philology, Professor,
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
References
1. Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). (2020). Speech Acts. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/speech-acts/ (accessed: 13.05.2025). (In English)
2. Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse Metaphors: The Link between Figurative Language and Habitual Analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, No. 18(3), pp. 445–466. (In English)
3. Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and Knowledge: On the Way to Acquiring Knowledge about Language: Parts of Speech from a Cognitive Perspective. The Role of Language in Cognition]. 560 p. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury. (In Russian)
4. Gavrilyuk, M. A. (2018). Obrashchenie v kitaiskom semeinom diskurse [Forms of Address in Chinese Family Discourse]. Filologichtskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. No. 3–1(81), pp. 81–84. (In Russian)
5. Ibn Manzur, Muhammad ibn Makram (1992). Lisan al-‘Arab. Ed. Ameen Abdulwahhab and Muhammad al-Ubaydi. Vol. 15, p. 468. Beirut, Dar Ihya alTurath al-Arabi. (In Arabic)
6. Al-Azhari, Muhammad ibn Ahmad (2001). Tahdhib al-lugha. Ed. Muhammad ‘Awad Mur‘ib. Vol. 10, p. 696. Beirut, Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. (In Arabic)
7. Al-Zamakhshari, Jar Allah (1992). Rabi al-abrar wa nusus al-akhyar. Vol. 2, p. 486. Beirut, Mu’assasat alA‘lamī. (In Arabic)
8. Hamdani, A. (2018). Forms of Address in Arabic Culture. International Journal of Linguistics, No. 10(3), pp. 70–82. (In English)
Review
For citations:
Abu G., Gabdreeva N.V. Addressee nomination in the presence of a third party in Russian and Arabic linguistic cultures. Philology and Culture. 2025;(3):7-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-81-3-7-14
















