Peculiarities of perception of Russian adjectives with perceptive semantics
https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-67-1-52-58
Abstract
The article studies certain aspects of perceptual modalities of Russian adjectives, based on the linguistic-psychological dictionary “Sensory Organs, Emotions and Adjectives of the Russian Language” by M. G. Kolbeneva and Y. I. Alexandrov. We put forward the hypothesis of a more complex modal organization of the perception of adjectives in comparison with the data presented in the linguistic-psychological dictionary; the adaptive experiment confirms the regression of monomodality with the increase in the number of informants. The perception of 48 Russian adjectives was studied in detail. The paper analyzes the features of perceptual modality distribution in the aspect of monomodality and polymodality, determines the leading modality of perception for 115 informants, and studies the correlation dependence of perceptual modalities (sight, hearing, smell, taste, tactility, motility). We investigate the uniformity of perceptual characteristic patterns based on the p-value criterion. For the first time, we have analyzed the motility modality in adjectives. The results of the study allow us to establish that the data from the linguistic-psychological dictionary “Sensory Organs, Emotions and Adjectives of the Russian Language” are not completely reliable; to achieve the significance criterion, it is necessary to increase the number of informants. In addition to comparing the results of the study with the data from the Russian linguistic-psychological dictionary, the paper draws parallels with similar foreign studies.
About the Author
O. Guseva
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga Andreevna Guseva, student
614990
15 Bukireva Str.
Perm
References
1. Sepir, E. (1993). Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kul'turologii [Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality]. 656 p. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)
2. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. 308 p. Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press. (In English)
3. Thagard, P., Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional Consciousness: A Neural Model of How Cognitive Appraisal and Somatic Perception Interact to Produce Qualitative Experience. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal. No. 17(3), pp. 811–834. (In English)
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and brain sciences. No. 22, pp. 577–660. (In English)
5. Glenberg, A. M., Robertson, D. A. (1991). Indexical Understanding of Instructions. Discourse Processes. No. 28(1), pp. 1–26. (In English)
6. Kolbeneva, M. G., Aleksandrov, Yu. I. (2010). Organy chuvstv, ehmotsii i prilagatel'nye russkogo yazyka : lingvo-psikhologicheskii slovar' [Sensory Organs, Emotions and Adjectives of the Russian Language : A Linguo-Psychological Dictionary]. In-t psikhologii RAN. 368 p. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur. (In Russian)
7. Morucci, P., Bottini, R., Crepaldi, D. (2019). Augmented Modality Exclusivity Norms for Concrete and Abstract Italian Property Words. Journal of Cognition. No. 2(1), 42, pp. 1–14. (In English)
8. Lynott, D., Connell, L. (2009). Modality Exclusivity Norms for 423 Object Properties. Behavior Research Methods. No. 41, pp. 558–564. (In English)
9. Vergallito ,M., Petilli, A., Marelli, M. (2020). Perceptual Modality Norms for 1, 121 Italian Words. A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behavior Research Methods. No. 52, 41 p. (In English)
10. Chen, I. H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y. et al. (2019). Mandarin Chinese Modality Exclusivity Norms. Plos one. No. 14(2), pp. 1–18. (In English)
11. Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M. et al. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional Measures of Perceptual and Action Strength for 40,000 English Words. Behavior Research Methods. No. 52, pp. 1271–1291. (In English)
12. Chedid, G., Brambati, S. M., Bedetti, C. et al. (2019). Visual and Auditory Perceptual Strength Norms for 3,596 French Nouns and Their Relationship with Other Psycholinguistic Variables. Behavior Research Methods. No. 51, pp. 2094–2105. (In English)
13. Speed, L. J., Brybaert, M. (2021). Dutch Sensory Modality Norms. Behavior Research Methods. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9 (accessed: 03. 11. 2021). (In English)
14. Diez-Alamo, M. A., Diez, E., Wojcik, D. Z. et al. (2018). Sensory Experience Ratings for 5,500 Spanish Words. Behavior Research Methods. No. 51 (3), pp. 1205–1215. (In English)
15. Shvyrkov, V. B. (1984). Psikhofiziologiya povedeniya i ehmotsii [Psychophysiology of Behavior and Emotions]. Mat-ly Mezhdunarodnoi Sovetsko-Amerikanskoi Pavlovskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi P. K. Anokhinu “Ehmotsii i povedenie: sistemnyi podkhod”. Moscow, pp. 317–319. (In Russian)
16. Onlain-servis 1KA [Online-service]. URL: https://www.1ka.si/ (accessed: 04. 04. 2021). (In Russian)
17. Kostevich, A. G. (2006). Zritel'no-slukhovoe vospriyatie audiovizual'nykh programm : uchebnoe posobie [Visual-Auditory Perception of Audiovisual Programs : A Tutorial]. 230 p. Tomsk. Tomskii mezhvuzovskii tsentr distantsionnogo obrazovaniya. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Guseva O. Peculiarities of perception of Russian adjectives with perceptive semantics. Philology and Culture. 2022;(1):52-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-67-1-52-58
Views:
131
Email this article 