The “Little Man” of the production novel and the chronological boundaries of the genre
https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-67-1-136-144
Abstract
In the studies of the production novel, one of the research lacunae in modern literary criticism is the definition of the upper chronological boundary of the genre. We believe, it is the image of the protagonist that makes it possible to clarify the dating of the genre completion. The artistic dominant of the genre is the image of the protagonist as a social leader, dating back to the universal mythopoetic archetype of the Reformer / Rebel. The departure from the evolution of this genre indicates its artistic transformation. It is significant that the production novel of the 20th century was preceded by the image of the “little man”, characteristic of the “natural school” of the 19th century. The return of the image of the “little man” to the literary process in the 1970s testifies to the completion of the production novel genre evolution. Most of the works, written in the 1970s, are distinguished by the journalism optics, since they “debunk myths” telling about the “professional workings” of fashionable, prestigious and familiar professions. The protagonists of “professional novels” are mercantile philistines, as well as master-hand executives deprived of freedom of action. This approach becomes an inversion to the production novel canonical text of the 1920s-30s, whose protagonist is an altruist and a social leader, free in his actions.
The object of the research is the genre of the production novel.
The subject of the study is the image of the protagonist.
The aim of the study is to clarify the chronological boundaries of the genre, based on the correlation with the typology of the protagonist’s image.
The research methods are: mythopoetic, historicogenetic, comparative-historical, typological and a contextual analysis.
About the Author
A. Gaganova
Moscow State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna Anatolievna Gaganova, Doctor of Philology, Professor
119991
Bl. 1, 1 Malaya Pirogovskaya Str.
Moscow
References
1. Zemskova, D. D. (2016). Sovetskiy proizvodstvennyy roman: evolyutsiya i khudozhestvennye osobennosti zhanra : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Soviet Production Novel: Its Evolution and Artistic Features of the Genre : Ph.D. Thesis Abstract]. 24 p. Moscow. (In Russian)
2. Ershov, L. F. (1988). Istoriya russkoy sovetskoy literatury : uchebnoe posobie dlya filologich. vuzov [History of Russian Soviet Literature : A Textbook for Philological Universities]. 656 p. Moscow. Vysshaya Shkola. (In Russian)
3. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya v 11 t. (1935) [Literary Encyclopedia in 11 Volumes]. T. 9, stat'ya, Proletarskaya sotsialisticheskaya literatura, kolonki 301–302. 832 p. Moscow. Izd-vo Kom. akad. (In Russian)
4. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya v 9 t. (1929–1939) [Literary Encyclopedia in 9 Volumes]. Pod red. V. M. Friche, A. V. Lunacharskogo. Moscow, izd-vo Kommunisticheskoy akademii, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russian)
5. Maslow, A. G. (2011). Motivatsiya i lichnost' [Motivation and Personality]. Per. s angl. T. Gutman, N. Mukhina. Izd. 3. Seriya: Mastera psikhologii. 351 p. Moscow (i dr.), Piter. (In Russian)
6. Il'f, I., Petrov, E. (1961). Zolotoy telenok [The Little Golden Calf]. Sobranie sochineniy v 5-ti tomakh. T. 2, 560 p. Moscow. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russian)
7. Leonov, L. M. (1961). Sot' [The Sot’]. Sobr. soch. v 9 t. T. 4. 394 p. Leningrad, Goslitizdat. (In Russian)
8. Lyashko, N. (1949). Domennaya pech' [The Blast Furnace]. Seriya: Biblioteka izbrannykh proizvedeniy sovetskoy lit-eratury. Izbrannoe. 304 p. Moscow. Sovetskiy pisatel'. (In Russian)
9. Malyshkin, A. (1965). Lyudi iz zakholust'ya [People from the Outback]. Biblioteka “Ogonek”. Sochineniya v 2-kh tomakh. T. 2. 496 p. Moscow, Pravda. (In Russian)
10. Kataev, V. (1989). Vremya, vpered! [Time, Forward!]. Predisl. B. E. Galanova. 528 p. Moscow. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russian)
11. Erenburg, I. (1934). Den' vtoroy [Second Day]. 254 p. Moscow. Sovetskaya literatura. (In Russian)
12. Yasenskii, B. Chelovek menyaet kozhu (1980) [Man Changing His Skin]. 528 p. Leningrad, Lenizdat. (In Russian)
13. Ketlinskaya, V. K. (1978). Muzhestvo [Courage]. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 t. T. 1. 663 p. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russian)
14. Vladimov, G. (1976). Tri minuty molchaniya [Three Minutes of Silence]. 382 p. Moscow. Sovremennik. (In Russian)
15. Sotsial'nyy portret: chelovek truda (sbornik ocherkov) (1967) [A Social Portrait: A Man of Labor (A Collection of Essays)]. Seriya: Biblioteka Komsomol'skoy pravdy, No. 10, 302 p. Moscow. Pravda. (In Russian)
16. Marchenko, A. (1972). Vremya iskat' sebya. Razmyshleniya o molodom geroe sovremennoy prozy [Time to Look for Yourself. Reflections on a Young Character of Modern Prose]. Novyy mir. No. 10, pp. 221–242. (In Russian)
17. Vlasenko, A. N. (1964). Geroy i sovremennost'. Razdum'ya o polozhitel'nom geroe v literature nashikh dney [Literary Character and Modernity. Reflections on the Positive Literary Character in Modern Literature]. 154 p. Moscow. Sovetskaya Rossiya. (In Russian)
18. Yanov, A. (1972). Dvizhenie molodogo geroya. Sotsiologicheskie zametki o khudozhestvennoy proze 60-kh godov [The Movement of a Young Protagonist. Sociological Notes on Fiction in the 1960s]. Novyy mir. No. 7, pp. 232–261. (In Russian)
19. Sobchuk, I. (1971). A rozu otleyte sami! [And Cast the Rose Yourself!]. Yunost'. No. 4, pp. 3–16. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Gaganova A. The “Little Man” of the production novel and the chronological boundaries of the genre. Philology and Culture. 2022;(1):136-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-67-1-136-144
Views:
121
Email this article 