Metasubject competencies and assessment of their development level in secondary school students
https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2021-64-2-239-245
Abstract
Metasubject competencies are the invariant basis of the educational process aimed at all round development of the student's personality and their effective activity in various spheres of life. Metasubject competencies help students to successfully acquire new knowledge and skills, as well as to master new methods of the metasubject cognitive activity. However, there is no singular universal definition of the concept “metasubject competences” either in the Federal State Educational Standards, or in Pedagogy. Based on the analysis of the existing approaches to the content of this concept, the author of the article suggests her own definition. Metasubject competencies are integrative skills of students enabling them to use subject and metasubject knowledge, methods of the metasubject cognitive activity and universal educational actions in one or several subject areas, as well as in real life situations. The article defines the methods for assessing the level of the metasubject competence development in secondary school students. The level of the metasubject competence development in 7th grade students was studied by using specially designed tasks. The article reports the findings of the research and formulates pedagogical conditions for the metasubject competence development in secondary schools.
About the Author
G. Gutorova
The Institute of the Tatar Encyclopedia and Regional Studies of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences; Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gulnara Daminzhanovna Gutorova, Scientific Researcher, graduate student
420015
56 Pushkin Str.
420008
18 Kremlyovskaya Str.
Kazan
References
1. Asmolov, A. G., Burmenskaia, G. V., Volodarskaia, I. A., et al. (2010). Formirovanie universal'nykh uchebnykh deistvii v osnovnoi shkole: ot deistviia k mysli. Sistema zadanii : posobie dlia uchitelia [Formation of Universal Educational Actions in Basic School: From Action to Thought. The System of Tasks : A Guide for the Teacher]. Ed. A. G. Asmolov. 159 p. Moscow, Prosveshhenie. (In Russian)
2. Borovskih, A. V., Rozov, N. H. (2014). Nadpredmetnoe soderzhanie shkol'nogo obrazovaniia [Over-Disciplinary Content of School Education]. Pedagogy. No.1, pp. 3–14. (In Russian)
3. Fedotova, A. V. (2016). Rol' universal'nyh uchebnyh dejstvij v sisteme sovremennogo obshhego obrazovanija The Role of Universal Educational Actions in the System of Modern General Education]. Molodoi uchenyi. No.1, pp. 716–719. (In Russian)
4. Galperin, P. Ya. (1965). Poetapnoe formirovanie umstvennoi deiatel’nosti. [Phased Formation of Mental Activity]. 51 p. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russian)
5. Gromyko, N. V. (2001). Metapredmet “Znanie” (Uchebnoe posobie) [Meta-subject “Knowledge” (A Tutorial)]. 544 p. Moscow, Pushkin Institute. (In Russian)
6. Gromyko, Yu. V. (1998). Mysledeiatel'nostnaia pedagogika [Thought Activity Pedagogy]. Moscow, Institut uchebnika “Paideia”. URL: https://shiffersinstitute.com/product/gromyko-yu-v-mysledeyatelnostnaya-pedagogika-teoretiko-prakticheskoe-rukovodstvo-po-osvoeniyu-vysshix-obrazcov-pedagogicheskogo-iskusstva-elektronnaya-versiya/?ysclid=lnn5w8vci7654601106 (accessed: 24. 01. 2021). (In Russian)
7. Gutorova, G. D. (2020). Sushchnost' i soderzhanie metapredmetnogo podkhoda v pedagogicheskoi nauke i FGOS [Meta-Subject Approach in Pedagogical Science and Federal State Educational Standards]. Pedagogical Review. No. 5 (33). pp. 41–50. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44095106_47257058.pdf (accessed: 28. 02. 2021). (In Russian)
8. Ialalov, F. G. (2004). Etnodidaktika kak tekhnologiia praktiko-orientirovannogo obucheniia [Ethnodidactics as a Technology of Practice-Oriented Education]. Alma mater (Bulletin of the higher school). No. 2, pp. 45–47. (In Russian)
9. Ialalov, F. G. (2005). Etnodidiktika narodov Rossii – issledovatel'skii proekt IuNESKO [Russian Peoples’ Ethnodidictics –a UNESCO Research Project]. Uspekhi sovremennogo yestestvoznaniia. No. 5, pp. 91–92. (In Russian)
10. Ialalov, F. G. (2004). Etnodidakticheskii podkhod k proektirovaniiu soderzhaniia natsional'nogo obrazovaniia [Ethno-Didactic Approach to the Design of the Content of National Education]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). No. 7, pp. 51–52. (In Russian)
11. Ialalov, F. G. (2015). Professional'naia mnogomernost': mnogomernye kompetentsii [Professional Multidimensionality: Multidimensional Competences]. Philology and Culture. No. 2 (40), pp. 326–329. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23503485_23236825.pdf (accessed: 20. 01. 2021). (In Russian)
12. Khutorskoi, A. V. (2012). Metapredmetnoe soderzhanie v standartakh novogo pokoleniia [Metasubject Content in New Generation Standards]. Shkol'nye tekhnologii. No. 4, pp. 36–47. (In Russian)
13. Pozdniakova, E. P. (2010). Model' razvitiia metapredmetnyh kompetentsii u mladshih shkol'nikov posredstvom interaktivnyh tehnologii [Model of Development of Meta-Subject Competences in Junior School-children by Means of Interactive Technologies]. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniia. No. 4 (23), pp. 205–206. (In Russian)
14. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century (Learning: The Treasure Within). (1996). UNESCO Publication. 46 p. (In English)
15. Vygotskii, L. S. (1999). Myshlenie i rech’ [Thinking and Speech]. 352 p. Moscow, Pedagogika, Publishing House of MSU. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Gutorova G. Metasubject competencies and assessment of their development level in secondary school students. Philology and Culture. 2021;(2):239-245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2021-64-2-239-245
Views:
140
Email this article 