Preview

Philology and Culture

Advanced search

The Euclidean metrics applied to the interphonemic distance measurements

https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-10-13

Abstract

   The similarity or dissimilarity of the spoken words is generally rendered by intuition, depending on the personal orientation or the personal traits of a listener/speaker. The existing methods of phonetic encoding of words suffer from a number of shortcomings, the main one being the impossibility of weighing spoken words in quantitative terms. Moreover, the existing methods may be related to a certain language or language family. The algorithm advanced in the present paper compares the characteristics of different phonemes that make up a word. The paper treats phonemic frequency and sonority as elements common both for consonants and vowels, backness and openness, as features pertaining to vowels, and the place of articulation pertaining to consonants only. The algorithm in question permits to compare in quantitative terms the words of different length, whether formed by open or closed syllables. The inter-phonemic distances are calculated by employing Euclidean metrics. The paper suggests fields of application of the method treated in the paper: this scheme can be applied in the fields of comparative linguistics, in medicine, when the hearing disorders are scrutinized, as well as in the brain cortex mapping.

About the Author

A. Zeldin
Civil Service Commission
Israel

Anatoly Zeldin, Ph.D. applicant

76300

Rehovot



References

1. Crystal, D. (1987). The Linguistic Use of Sound. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press. (In English)

2. De Saussure, F. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. New York, The Philosophical Library. (In English)

3. Dineen, N., Miller, D. (1995). The Derivation of a Sonority Hierarchy from the Syllable Contact Law (SCL) and the Productivity of the SCL in American English. George Mason University Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 5, pp. 19–47. (In English)

4. Knuth, D. (1973). The Art of Computer Programming. V. 3: Sorting and Searching. Addison-Wesley. (In English)

5. Levenshtein, V. (1966). Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady. No. 10 (8), pp. 707–710. (In English)

6. Lieberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the Speech Code. Psychological Review. No. 74(6), pp. 431-461. (In English)

7. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J. (2004). WordNet:Similarity – Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts. Proceedings of the XIX Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04). July 25-29, pp.1024-1025 San Jose, CA (Intelligent Systems Demonstration). (In English)

8. Philips, L. (1990). Hanging on the Metaphone. Computer Language Magazine. No. 7 (12), pp. 39-44. (In English)

9. Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F., Hauk, O. (2006). Motor cortex map articulatory features of speech sounds. PNAS. No. 103(20), pp. 7865-7870. (In English)

10. Van Son, R .J. J. H., Pols, L. C. W. (1996). An Acoustic Profile of Consonant Reduction. Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing ICSLP'96. Pp. 1529-1532. (In English)

11. Vinogradov, V. (1990). Fonema [The Phoneme]. Lingvisticheskii Entsiklopedicheskii Slovar'. Yartseva V. (ed.-in-chief), Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, Pp. 552-554. Moscow. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Zeldin A. The Euclidean metrics applied to the interphonemic distance measurements. Philology and Culture. 2023;(1):10-13. https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-10-13

Views: 129


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-4756 (Print)