On the concept of “function” in functional linguistics
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-77-3-26-39
Abstract
The article considers the concept of “function” in linguistics as the essence of language which determines its nature. The purpose of the study is to define the main concept of language “function” in linguistics and to identify the invariant function of language in functional linguistics. Language, acting as an instrument of exteriorization both of thinking, knowledge and of consciousness, performs many functions. Thus, monofunctionalists believe that the fundamental function of language is its communicative function, which is a derivative for other functions, subfunctions and epifunctions. The interest of polyfunctionalists is primarily focused on determining the number of inherent functions of language and their hierarchical relationship and interdependence. Today, the question of the concept “function” semantic content in linguistics remains open, since there is no exact definition of the term primarily due to the “multidimensionality” of language itself; therefore, disputes arise in the definition of this concept both between linguistic schools and within the framework of one linguistic circle. On the basis of the conducted research, we give the definition of the concept of language “function” as the essence, the meaning (purpose) of language existence. The function, having predetermined the nature of language, forms both the structure of language and its elements, as well as the connections between these elements. In the process of language “functioning”, linguistic units are selected, which are capable of realizing a certain communicative task (meaning) that the subject of speech wants to achieve in the process of a communicative act. In addition, the article concludes that in the modern linguistic paradigm, which is based on the concept of “function”, the regulatory function acts as an invariant function of language. At the initial stages of the human development, the trigger that provoked the emergence of an iconic instrument for regulation of social interaction was the collision of the “due” and the “given”. In the course of evolution, “regulation” expands its scope from influencing the behavior to influencing the consciousness of a person and society by expanding their “ordinary” picture of the world.
About the Author
N. ZubenkoRussian Federation
Zubenko Natalya Viktorovna, graduate student; Assistant Professor
11 Lenin Str., Simferopol, 295000, Russian Federation
33 Universitetskaya Str., Sevastopol, 299053, Russian Federation
References
1. Potebnya, A. A. (1999). Polnoe sobranie trudov: Mysl' i yazyk [Complete Works: Thought and Language]. Podgotovka teksta Yu. S. Rasskazova i O. A. Sycheva. Kommentarii Yu. S. Rasskazova. 269 p. Moscow, Labirint. (In Russian)
2. Slovar' filosofskikh terminov (2005) [Dictionary of Philosophical Terms]. Nauchnaya redaktsiya professora V. G. Kuznetsova. XVI. 731 p. Moscow, INFRA-M. (In Russian)
3. Abaev, V. I. (1995). Izbrannye trudy: V 4 t. T. 2. Obshchee i sravnitel'noe iazykoznanie [Selected Works: In 4 Vols. Vol. 2. General and Comparative Linguistics]. Otv. red. i sost. V. M. Gusalov. 724 p. Vladikavkaz, Ir. (In Russian)
4. Leshchak, O. V. (1997). Metodologicheskie osnovy funktsional'nogo issledovaniya yazykovoi deyatel'nosti: Na materiale slavyan. yaz.: dissertatsiya … doktora filologicheskikh nauk: 10.02.19. [Methodological Foundations of the Functional Study of Linguistic Activity: Based on the Material of the Slav Languages: Doctoral Thesis]. Ternopol', 529 p. + Pril. (121 p.: il.). (In Russian)
5. Zubkova, L. G. (2002). Obshchaya teoriya yazyka v razvitii: Ucheb. Posobie [The General Theory of Language in Development: A Textbook]. 472 p. Moscow, izd-vo RUDN. (In Russian)
6. Gumbol'dt, V. fon (2000). Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniiu: Per. s nem. [Selected Works on Linguistics: Trans. from German]. Obshch. Red. G. V. Ramishvili; Poslesl. A. V. Gulygi i V. A. Zvegintseva. 400 p. Moscow, OAO IG “Progress”. (In Russian)
7. Ol'shanskii, I. G. (2004). Ot funktsii k funktsional'noi leksikologii [From Function to Functional Lexicology]. XI Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po funktsional'noi lingvistike “Funktsional'noe opisanie estestvennogo yazyka i ego edinits”. Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov. Yalta 4-8 oktyabrya, pp. 269–270. (In Russian)
8. Kiklevich, A. K. (2008). Prityazhenie yazyka. T. 2: Funktsional'naya lingvistika [The Attraction of Language. Vol. 2: Functional Linguistics]. 391 p. Ol'shtyn. (In Russian)
9. Dem'yankov, V. Z. (2000). Funktsionalizm v zarubezhnoi lingvistike kontsa XX v. [Functionalism in Foreign Linguistics of the Late 20th Century]. Diskurs, rech', rechevaia deyatel'nost': funktsional'nye i strukturnye aspekty: Sb. Obzorov. RAN. INION. Tsentr gumanitar. Nauchn.-inform. Issled. Otd. Yazykoznaniya; Redkol.: Romashko S. A., otv. red. i dr. (Ser.: Teoriya i istoriya yazykoznaniya), pp. 26–136. (In Russian)
10. Desheriev, Yu. D. (1977). Sotsial'naya lingvistika. K osnovam obshchei teorii [Social Linguistics. On the Basics of General Theory]. 382 p. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
11. Kolshanskii, G. V. (2007) Kommunikativnaya funktsiya i struktura yazyka [The Communicative Function and Structure of Language]. Izd. 3-e. 176 p. Moscow, izdatel'stvo LKI. (In Russian)
12. Pazukhin, R. V. (1979). Yazyk, funktsiya, kommunikatsiya [Language, Function, Communication]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. No 6, pp. 42–50. (In Russian)
13. Ivanitskii, V. V. (2004). Funktsii yazyka [Language Functions]. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No 29, pp. 103–110. (In Russian)
14. El'mslev, L. (2006). Prolegomeny k teorii yazyka: Per. s angl. [Prolegomena to the Theory of Language: Translated from English]. Sost. V. D. Mazo. 248 p. Moscow, KomKniga. (In Russian)
15. Karabykov, A. V. (2008). K voprosu o sistemnom predstavlenii funktsii yazyka [On the Issue of the System Representation of Language Functions]. Vestn. Om. Un-ta. No. 3, pp. 79–84. (In Russian)
16. Bogushevich, D. G. (1985). Edinitsa, funktsiya, uroven': K probleme klassifikatsii edinits yazyka [Unit, Function, Level: On the Problem of Classification of Language Units]. 116 p. Minsk, Vysh. Shk. (In Russian)
17. Fossler, K. (2007). Esteticheskii idealizm: Izbrannye raboty po yazykoznaniyu: Per. s nem [Aesthetic Idealism: Selected Works on Linguistics: Trans. From German]. Sost. V. D. Mazo; Vstup. st. O. A. Radchenko; st. V. A. Zvegintseva. 144 p. Moscow, izdatel'stvo LKI. (In Russian)
18. Zaika, V. I. (2013). Model' funktsii yazyka i rechi dlya distsiplin, izuchaiushchikh upotreblenie yazyka [A Model of Language and Speech Functions for Disciplines Studying the Use of Language]. Białostockie Archiwum Językowe. No. 13, pp. 415–430. (In Russian)
19. Dressler, V. U. (1990). Protiv neodnoznachnosti termina “funktsiya” v “funktsional'nykh” grammatikakh [Against the Ambiguity of the Term “Function” in “Functional” Grammars]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. No. 2, pp. 57–64. (In Russian)
20. Vedenina, L. G. (1985). Osnovnaya problematika frantsuzskogo funktsionalizma: Vstupitel'naya stat'ya [The Main Problem of French Functionalism: An Introductory Article]. M. Mamudian Lingvistika. per. s frants. iaz. i vstup. Stat'ya L. G. Vedeninoi. Pp. 5–30. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)
21. Shmelev, D. N. (1977). Russkii yazyk v ego funktsional'nykh raznovidnostiakh (K postanovke problemy) [The Russian Language in Its Functional Varieties (On the Formulation of the Problem)]. 167 p. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
22. Leont'ev, A. A. (1963). Vozniknovenie I pervonachal'noe razvitie yazyka [The Origin and Initial Development of Language]. 139 p. Moscow, izd-vo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (In Russian)
23. Leont'ev, A. A. (1969). Yazyk, rech', rechevaya deyatel'nost' [Language, Speech, Speech Activity]. 214 p. Moscow, Prosveshchenie. (In Russian)
24. Leont'ev, A. A. (1974). Osnovy teorii rechevoi deyatel'nosti [Fundamentals of the Theory of Speech Activity]. 368 p. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
25. Avrorin, V. A. (1975). Problemy izucheniya funktsional'noi storony yazyka (K voprosu o predmete sotsiolingvistiki) [Problems of Studying the Functional Side of Language (On the Subject of Sociolinguistics)]. 276 p. Leningrad, Nauka. (In Russian)
26. Shelyakin, M. A. (2001). Funktsional'naya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Functional Grammar of the Russian Language]. 288 p. Moscow, Russkii yazyk. (In Russian)
27. Stepanov, Yu. S. (1975). Metody i printsipy sovremennoi lingvistiki [Methods and Principles of Modern Linguistics]. 311 p. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
28. Tezisy Prazhskogo lingvisticheskogo kruzhka (1967) [Abstracts of the Prague Linguistic Circle]. Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok: sb. statei. Sost., red. I predisl. I. A. Kondrashova. 558 p. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)
29. Skalichka, V. (1060). Kopengagenskii strukturalizm i “Prazhskaya shkola” [Copenhagen Structuralism and the Prague School]. Zvegintsev V. A. Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX i XX vekov v ocherkakh I izvlecheniyakh. Ch 2, pp. 92–99. Moscow, Prosveshchenie. (In Russian)
30. Rudyakov, A. N. (2013). Topory i teksty. Lingvisticheskaya instrumentologiya: uchebnoe posobie [Axes and Texts. Linguistic Instrumentology: A Textbook]. 312 p. Moscow, FLINTA, Nauka. (In Russian)
31. Rudyakov, A. N. (2023). Funktsiya i yazyk: k regulyativnoi paradigme v lingvistike [Function and Language: Towards a Regulatory Paradigm in Linguistics]. 216 p. Moscow, izdatel'skii dom YaSK. (Studia philologica). (In Russian)
32. Rudyakov, A. N. (2004). Yazyk, ili Pochemu lyudi govoryat (opyt funktsional'nogo opredeleniya
33. estestvennogo yazyka) [Language, or Why People Speak (Experience of Functional Definition of Natural Language)]. 224 p. Kyiv, Gramota. (In Russian)
34. Gak, V. G. (1985). K tipologii funktsional'nykh podkhodov k izucheniyu yazyka [On the Typology of Functional Approaches to Language Learning]. Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Pp. 5–15. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
35. Bondarko, A. V. (1985). K teorii funktsional'noi grammatiki [Towards the Theory of Functional Grammar]. Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Pp. 16–29. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
36. Abramov, B. A. (1985). O funktsiyakh, izofunktsiyakh, funktsional'nom podkhode I funktsional'noi grammatike [About Functions, Isofunctions, Functional Approach and Functional Grammar]. Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Pp. 77–87. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
37. Zolotova, G. A. (1985). K postroeniyu funktsional'nogo sintaksisa russkogo yazyka [Towards the Construction of the Functional Syntax of the Russian Language]. Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Pp. 87–93. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
38. Zolotova, G. A. (2004). Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [The Communicative Grammar of the Russian Language]. G. A. Zolotova, N. K. Onipenko, M. Yu. Sodorova; Ros. akad. nauk. In-t rus. yaz. im. V. V. Vinogradova, Mosk. gos. un-t im. M. V. Lomonosova. Filol. fak. 540 p. Moscow, In-t rus. yaz. RAN im. V. V. Vinogradova. (In Russian)
39. Syrovatkin, S. N. (1973). Znachenie vyskazyvaniya i funktsii yazyka v semioticheskoi traktovke [The Meaning of the Utterance and the Function of Language in a Semiotic Interpretation]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. No. 5, pp. 43–49. (In Russian)
40. Luriya, A. R. (1979). Yazyk i soznanie [Language and Consciousness]. Pod redaktsiei E. D. Homskoi. 320 p. Moscow, izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta. (In Russian)
41. Porshnev, B. F. (2006). O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii (Problemy paleopsikhologii) [On the Beginning of Human History (Problems of Paleopsychology)]. Pod red. B. A. Dilenko. 640 p. Moscow, FJeRI-V. (In Russian)
42. Rudyakov, N. A. (1993). Poetika, stilistika khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya [Poetics and Stylistics of a Fictional Work]. 146 p. Simferopol', Tavriya. (In Russian)
43. Rudyakov, A. N. (2020). Lingvistika i eye “skelety v shkafu” [Linguistics and Its “Skeletons in the Closet”]. 416 p. Moscow, izdatel'skii tsentr “Azbukovnik”. (In Russian)
44. Rudyakov, A. N. (1998). Lingvisticheskii funktsionalizm i funktsional'naya semantika [Linguistic Functionalism and Functional Semantics]. 224 p. Simferopol', Tavriya-plyus. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Zubenko N. On the concept of “function” in functional linguistics. Philology and Culture. 2024;(3):26-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-77-3-26-39