Linguistic and cultural codes in representing the comic category
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-80-2-78-86
Abstract
This article studies the comic category and considers the key theoretical approaches to understanding the nature of laughter, its role in culture, as well as the function of the comic as a form of critical reflection on reality, analyzing the aesthetic aspects of laughter as a phenomenon reflecting the contradictions of human existence and social life. The article emphasizes that the comic is an integral part of artistic creation, capable of performing entertaining and cognitive, moral and evaluative functions. Considerable attention is paid to the phenomenon of national humor, its cultural specifics, reflecting the mental characteristics of the people. The concept of a frame is also explored as a cognitive structure that shapes the perception of the comic in a certain socio-cultural context. The article focuses on the linguistic and cultural approach, which allows us to consider the comic through the prism of linguistic and cultural codes, fixed in the national consciousness. Our linguistic analysis is based on the texts by M. Zadornov and M. Zhvanetsky. Special emphasis is placed on highlighting the key forms of comic realization, which have specific artistic and expressive means and perform various functions in the context of cultural communication. In addition, the article presents the typology of humorous statements, taking into account the peculiarities of the modern discursive space, formed by the processes of digitalization, and analyzes the classification of constitutive types of humorous statements.
About the Author
G. G. FefelovaRussian Federation
Fefelova Galina Gennadevna, Ph.D. in Pedagogy, Associate Professor,
1 Cosmonauts Str., Ufa, 450064
References
1. Sychev, A. A. (2003). Priroda smekha ili Filosofiya komicheskogo [The Nature of Laughter or the Philosophy of the Comic]. 174 p. Saransk, izd-vo Mordovskogo universiteta. (In Russian)
2. Stolovich, L. N. (1999). Filosofiya. Estetika. Smekh [Philosophy. Aesthetics. Smekh]. 383 p. St. Petersburg, Tartu. (In Russian)
3. Pinsky, L. E. (2002). Renessans. Barokko. Prosveshchenie [Renaissance. The Baroque. Enlightenment]. 827 p. Moscow, Ros. gos. gumanit. un-tet. (In Russian)
4. Karasev, L. V. (1996). Filosofiya smekha [Philosophy of Laughter]. 224 p. Moscow, Ros. gos. gumanit. un-tet. (In Russian)
5. Borev, Yu. B. (1957). O komicheskom [On the Comic]. 232 p. Moscow, Iskusstvo. (In Russian)
6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Тvоrchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kultura srednevekov’ya i renessansa [The Work of Francois Rabelais and the Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. 541 p. Moscow, Khud. lit. (In Russian)
7. Propp, V. Ya. (1976). Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical Roots of a Fairy Tale]. 267 p. Leningrad, Leningradskii gos.universitet. (In Russian)
8. Dmitriev, A. V. (1996). Sotsiologiya yumora: Ocherki [Sociology of Humor: Essays]. 214 p. Moscow, izd. OFSPP RAS. (In Russian)
9. Shcherbina, A. A. (1971). Zаmеtki о prirode i tekhnike ironii [Notes on the Nature and Techniques of Irony]. Vopr. rus. literatury, pp. 129–144. Izd-vo Lviv, GU. (In Russian)
10. Ivanova, L. P. (2007). Lingvokulturologicheskie aspekty komicheskogo (k postanovke problemy) [Linguoculturological Aspects of the Comic (To Pose the Problem)]. Logicheskii analiz yazyka: yazykovye mekhanizmy komizma. Rossiiskaya akad. nauk, In-t yazykoznaniya; otv. red. N. D. Arutyunova. Pp. 651–658. Moscow, Indrik. (In Russian)
11. Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (1987) [Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary]. 752 p. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia. (In Russian)
12. Zadornov, M. N. Monologi [Monologues]. URL: https://libking.ru/books/entert-humor/60378-mihail-zadornov-monologi.html (accessed: 30.04.2025). (In Russian)
13. Zhvanetsky, M. M. (2001–2006). Sobranie proizvedenii v 5 tomakh [Collected Works: In 5 Volumes]. Moscow, Vremya. (In Russian)
14. Fefelova, G. G., Anisimova, A. G. (2025). Issledovanie komicheskogo discursa cherez prizmu yazyka i kultury [A Study of Comic Discourse through the Prism of Language and Culture]. Voprosy prikladnoi lingvistiki. No. 57, pp. 71–97. (In Russian)
15. Ershov, P. M. (1998). Оbshchеniе nа urokе, ili Rezhissura povedeniya uchitelya [Communication in the Classroom, or Directing Teacher Behavior]. P. M. Yershov, A. P. Yershova, V. M. Bukatov. 2-oe izd., pererab. i dop. 366 p. Moscow, Flinta. (In Russian)
16. Generator shutok onlain [Online Joke Generator]. URL: https://ujeen.ru/tools/generator-shutok / (accessed: 04.23.2025). (In Russian)
17. Pinsky, L. E. (2002). Renessans. Barokko. Prosveshchenie [Renaissance. The Baroque. Enlightenment]. 827 p. Moscow, Ros. gos. gumanit. un-tet. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Fefelova G.G. Linguistic and cultural codes in representing the comic category. Philology and Culture. 2025;(2):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2025-80-2-78-86